Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Claude Opus 5 d7a1c4d5e1 docs: the Coolify deploy hook is LIVE — six docs still say it is a placeholder
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 31s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (push) Successful in 42s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 44s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 1m6s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 30s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (pull_request) Successful in 37s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 26s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
Six documents on main assert that no Coolify app has been provisioned for 0pt and
that cd.yml's COOLIFY_APP_ID is a literal placeholder whose guard fails the job on
purpose. That is no longer true, and the gap is not cosmetic: it means a merge to
main silently ships to production while the repo's own docs promise it cannot.

Measured, not assumed:

  * repo Actions secret  COOLIFY_TOKEN   exists, created 2026-08-31T11:34:34Z
    (GET /api/v1/repos/sax3l/0pt/actions/secrets)
  * repo Actions variable COOLIFY_APP_ID exists with a real 24-character value,
    not the "TODO-no-coolify-app-provisioned-yet" literal
    (GET /api/v1/repos/sax3l/0pt/actions/variables)
  * both guards in .gitea/workflows/cd.yml therefore pass; on the push to main at
    1ff34410 (2026-09-06) the job "Deploy to Coolify / deploy" (run 11695, job
    26295) finished SUCCESS with "coolify deploy HTTP 200" in its log

Deliberately NOT claimed: that the Coolify app builds, starts or serves, or that
0pt.app DNS points at it rather than Vercel. Nobody probed the running site, and
every corrected passage says so explicitly rather than replacing one unverified
claim with another.

Corrected: README.md "Deploy", docs/02-architecture.md hosting callout,
docs/architecture/decisions/0001 (consequence annotated, decision untouched --
an ADR is a historical record), docs/runbook/incident.md (the symptom row is now
inverted: the risk is an unintended deploy, not a red job),
docs/compliance/GOLDEN-STANDARD-REPORT.md D4 (❌ -> ⚠️, not ✅, because "webhook
accepted" is not "app serves"), docs/compliance/INVENTORY.md CI row.

Falsifiable check over all six files (stale claim present without a correction
marker = red):

  origin/main                                  -> FAIL (12 findings)
  this branch                                  -> PASS
  mutation: drop only the README bullet        -> FAIL
  mutation: drop only the runbook correction   -> FAIL

The check initially passed vacuously on docs/02-architecture.md because PR #32 had
already put the string "CORRECTED 2026-09-06" in that file for an unrelated reason;
the marker was made specific so the check could actually fail there too.

Docs only. No workflow files, no .gitignore, no source.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-06 09:56:53 +02:00
admin 328f8a46cb docs+chore: repo hygiene -- v2.0 manifests, ADRs, changelog, doctor, guides
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 19s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 19s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 44s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 21s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 20s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 42s
BACKLOG P1-1: siax.repo.json/siax.config.json rewritten to be schema-valid
against sax3l/siax-standard's actual v2.0 schemas (lifecycle,
operationalState, gitHost, domains-as-objects, consumedBy, children,
contracts -- validated with jsonschema, not just eyeballed). config.json
restructured to the real deploy-descriptor shape (framework/build/start/
port/healthcheck/environments) instead of duplicating repo.json's identity
fields, which the schema doesn't allow.

BACKLOG P1-2: 3 ADRs for decisions already made and evidenced elsewhere in
this repo (Coolify-not-Vercel, Zitadel-not-NextAuth, Iceberg-format pointer
to n0d ADR-0030) -- retroactive documentation, not new decisions. The
Stripe/Revolut and services/scrapers/* questions are explicitly NOT written
as ADRs here; both are account-owner-gated or actively under review
elsewhere (see docs/architecture/decisions/README.md).

BACKLOG P1-3: CHANGELOG.md from real git log history (no tags/releases
exist yet -- this doesn't invent version numbers that were never cut).

BACKLOG P1-19: `pnpm siax:doctor` (scripts/siax-doctor.mjs, AGENT-04) --
zero-dependency, checks required files + manifest shape, prints
control-IDs. .devcontainer/devcontainer.json (DX-03). compose.dev.yaml
(DX-02 -- UNVERIFIED, no Docker available in this environment to smoke-test,
flagged in the file itself). All 4 prompts + the index rewritten to AGENT-03
shape (goal/context/prerequisites/scope/contract/acceptance-criteria/
control-ID/forbidden-actions).

BACKLOG P1-20: docs/architecture/ARCHITECTURE.md migrated to the v2.0
9-heading template -- new §5 "Ytor och paritet" (capability x
API/CLI/MCP/console coverage table, grounded in the same registry facts
docs/02-architecture.md already established), §6-9 renumbered from the old
§5-8 (all internal cross-references fixed, CLAUDE.md's own §-numbers left
untouched). docs/api/ added (points at contracts/openapi.yaml as the one
SSOT instead of duplicating it as drift-prone prose).

BACKLOG P1-21: packages/schemas now has a real package.json (was loose JSON
files with no package -- pnpm-workspace.yaml's packages/* glob matched an
empty package). Verified `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` and the full
typecheck/test/build suite still pass with 2 real workspace projects.
apps/ restructuring explicitly NOT attempted (BACKLOG's own effort estimate
is "L" / large -- moving the whole app tree is a bigger, riskier change than
belongs in this pass). Import-boundary check added via dependency-cruiser
(ARK-14) -- installed for real, config tested against this codebase (179
modules, 310 deps, 0 violations), wired as `pnpm run deps:check` (advisory,
not yet a CI gate).

BACKLOG P2-5: docs/02-architecture.md's "Hosting" section marked SUPERSEDED
(the Vercel plan was superseded by the Coolify deploy.target flip,
2026-08-09 -- ADR-0001). README.md/.env.example were checked and are
already accurately framed (live-on-Vercel vs. config-target-is-Coolify) --
not touched.

BACKLOG P3-5: 2 stale github.com/sax3l/0pt/pull/3 links removed (the PR
merged long ago, .env.example is real and current) -- docs/09-build-plan.md,
docs/08-infrastructure.md. The "two diverged remotes, unresolved which is
canonical" language elsewhere (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, SECURITY.md, etc.) is
deliberately NOT touched -- that's a live, correctly-flagged, account-owner-
owned open question per the Gitea-exclusivity mandate, not a stale link.

BACKLOG P6 (19 items): concrete artifacts for the ones that are actually a
file (.editorconfig, dependency-cruiser, deprecation policy, K8s reference
manifest, .actrc, Makefile, ONBOARDING.md); docs/guides/P6-GUIDES.md for the
rest (CLI-13, DOC-18, UI-30, IAM-19, PAY-11, AI-18, OBS-21, TEST-20, NET-19,
SCALE-13, OSS-10, AGENT-13) -- each grounded in this repo's actual code/gaps,
not generic advice.

NOT attempted (out of this task's scope, noted for the record):
- P2-1 (cl0ud app-registry.ts mismatch) -- lives in a different repo
  (sax3l/cl0ud), not cloned/authorized for this task's single-repo PR flow.
- The CI "doctor step" half of P1-15 -- deliberately left out of this PR's
  .gitea/workflows/ci.yml to avoid a 3-way merge conflict with
  ci/security-headers-and-scanning, which already restructured that file;
  add it as a follow-up once that PR merges.

This branch was authored independently of, but shares docs/architecture/
ARCHITECTURE.md and docs/slo.md with, fix/honest-health-check and
ci/security-headers-and-scanning -- expect a small, normal merge conflict
if this is rebased after either of those merge first (both already rebased
cleanly against each other and against main as of this commit).
2026-08-11 14:18:00 +02:00