Em dashes (—) and en dashes (–) had spread across comments, docs, tests, and a few UI strings, reading as AI-generated boilerplate rather than house style. Replaced each with punctuation matching its context: colon for explanatory clauses, comma for asides, plain hyphen for numeric/legal ranges (e.g. "21-23§"), "to"/"till" for date ranges, parentheses for paired-dash asides. messages/en.json and messages/sv.json were fixed by hand together to keep sv/en in sync. Left untouched where the dash is the functional subject rather than decorative punctuation: date-range-parser.ts's separator regex, charset-repair.ts's CP1252 byte-mapping table (and its test), the SIE encoding mojibake docs, generic-csv.ts's minus-sign normalizer, the agent system-prompt files that already instruct against em dashes, and a golden iXBRL test fixture compared byte-for-byte. Also fixes two bugs surfaced along the way: an off-by-one in ApiKeysPanel's scope-label split (a leftover from an earlier partial pass), and a charset-repair test that had lost the literal en-dash it exists to verify. Regenerated the agent atom seed migration (skills:generate) since 27 SKILL.md files changed. Added a CLAUDE.md rule against em/en dashes, with an explicit carve-out for the functional-dash cases above. Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
204 lines
8.4 KiB
TypeScript
204 lines
8.4 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* pg-real test for the payment company-consistency triggers
|
|
* (20260619130000_payment_company_consistency.sql).
|
|
*
|
|
* invoice_payments and supplier_invoice_payments are the only two child tables
|
|
* carrying BOTH a parent FK and their own company_id. A row whose company_id
|
|
* disagrees with its parent's company_id is a tenant-isolation defect. The
|
|
* BEFORE INSERT/UPDATE triggers make a mismatched pair impossible to persist
|
|
* regardless of how it is written: so these probes go through the superuser
|
|
* pool (which bypasses RLS), proving the trigger fires even for the most
|
|
* privileged writer.
|
|
*/
|
|
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest'
|
|
import { randomUUID } from 'node:crypto'
|
|
import { getPool } from './setup'
|
|
import { seedCompany } from './fixtures'
|
|
|
|
let arrivalSeq = 0
|
|
|
|
async function seedCustomerInvoice(params: {
|
|
userId: string
|
|
companyId: string
|
|
total?: number
|
|
}): Promise<string> {
|
|
const customerId = randomUUID()
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.customers (id, user_id, company_id, name, customer_type)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'Test Kund AB', 'swedish_business')`,
|
|
[customerId, params.userId, params.companyId],
|
|
)
|
|
const id = randomUUID()
|
|
const total = params.total ?? 1000
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.invoices
|
|
(id, user_id, company_id, customer_id, invoice_number, invoice_date, due_date,
|
|
currency, subtotal, vat_amount, total, vat_treatment, vat_rate, status,
|
|
paid_amount, remaining_amount)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, '2026-04-01', '2026-05-01', 'SEK',
|
|
$6, 0, $6, 'standard_25', 25, 'sent', 0, $6)`,
|
|
[id, params.userId, params.companyId, customerId, `F-${id.slice(0, 8)}`, total],
|
|
)
|
|
return id
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function seedSupplierInvoice(params: {
|
|
userId: string
|
|
companyId: string
|
|
total?: number
|
|
}): Promise<string> {
|
|
const supplierId = randomUUID()
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.suppliers
|
|
(id, user_id, company_id, name, supplier_type, country, default_payment_terms, default_currency)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'Leverantör AB', 'swedish_business', 'SE', 30, 'SEK')`,
|
|
[supplierId, params.userId, params.companyId],
|
|
)
|
|
const id = randomUUID()
|
|
const total = params.total ?? 1000
|
|
const arrivalNumber = (Date.now() % 1_000_000) * 1000 + arrivalSeq++
|
|
await getPool().query(
|
|
`INSERT INTO public.supplier_invoices
|
|
(id, user_id, company_id, supplier_id, arrival_number, supplier_invoice_number,
|
|
invoice_date, due_date, received_date, status, currency,
|
|
subtotal, vat_amount, total, paid_amount, remaining_amount,
|
|
vat_treatment, reverse_charge, is_credit_note)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6, '2026-04-01', '2026-05-01', '2026-04-01', 'approved', 'SEK',
|
|
$7, 0, $7, 0, $7, 'standard_25', false, false)`,
|
|
[id, params.userId, params.companyId, supplierId, arrivalNumber, `LF-${arrivalNumber}`, total],
|
|
)
|
|
return id
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const INSERT_INVOICE_PAYMENT = `
|
|
INSERT INTO public.invoice_payments
|
|
(user_id, company_id, invoice_id, payment_date, amount, currency)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, '2026-05-05', 100, 'SEK')
|
|
RETURNING id`
|
|
|
|
const INSERT_SUPPLIER_PAYMENT = `
|
|
INSERT INTO public.supplier_invoice_payments
|
|
(user_id, company_id, supplier_invoice_id, payment_date, amount, currency)
|
|
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, '2026-05-05', 100, 'SEK')
|
|
RETURNING id`
|
|
|
|
describe('invoice_payments: company-consistency trigger', () => {
|
|
it('accepts a payment whose company_id matches its invoice', async () => {
|
|
const a = await seedCompany()
|
|
const invoiceId = await seedCustomerInvoice({ userId: a.userId, companyId: a.companyId })
|
|
|
|
const res = await getPool().query(INSERT_INVOICE_PAYMENT, [a.userId, a.companyId, invoiceId])
|
|
expect(res.rows).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
expect(res.rows[0].id).toBeTruthy()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects a payment whose company_id is a different tenant than its invoice', async () => {
|
|
const a = await seedCompany()
|
|
const b = await seedCompany()
|
|
const invoiceId = await seedCustomerInvoice({ userId: a.userId, companyId: a.companyId })
|
|
|
|
// company_id = B but the invoice belongs to A → trigger must raise.
|
|
await expect(
|
|
getPool().query(INSERT_INVOICE_PAYMENT, [b.userId, b.companyId, invoiceId]),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/does not match invoices\.company_id/i)
|
|
|
|
// Nothing persisted.
|
|
const rows = await getPool().query(
|
|
`SELECT id FROM public.invoice_payments WHERE invoice_id = $1`,
|
|
[invoiceId],
|
|
)
|
|
expect(rows.rows).toHaveLength(0)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects an UPDATE that points company_id at a foreign tenant', async () => {
|
|
const a = await seedCompany()
|
|
const b = await seedCompany()
|
|
const invoiceId = await seedCustomerInvoice({ userId: a.userId, companyId: a.companyId })
|
|
const ins = await getPool().query(INSERT_INVOICE_PAYMENT, [a.userId, a.companyId, invoiceId])
|
|
const paymentId = ins.rows[0].id as string
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
getPool().query(`UPDATE public.invoice_payments SET company_id = $1 WHERE id = $2`, [
|
|
b.companyId,
|
|
paymentId,
|
|
]),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/does not match invoices\.company_id/i)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects rerouting invoice_id to a foreign tenant invoice (UPDATE OF invoice_id path)', async () => {
|
|
const a = await seedCompany()
|
|
const b = await seedCompany()
|
|
const invoiceA = await seedCustomerInvoice({ userId: a.userId, companyId: a.companyId })
|
|
const invoiceB = await seedCustomerInvoice({ userId: b.userId, companyId: b.companyId })
|
|
const ins = await getPool().query(INSERT_INVOICE_PAYMENT, [a.userId, a.companyId, invoiceA])
|
|
const paymentId = ins.rows[0].id as string
|
|
|
|
// company_id stays A; only the parent FK is rerouted to B's invoice:
|
|
// exercises the UPDATE OF invoice_id leg of the trigger column filter.
|
|
await expect(
|
|
getPool().query(`UPDATE public.invoice_payments SET invoice_id = $1 WHERE id = $2`, [
|
|
invoiceB,
|
|
paymentId,
|
|
]),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/does not match invoices\.company_id/i)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('supplier_invoice_payments: company-consistency trigger', () => {
|
|
it('accepts a payment whose company_id matches its supplier invoice', async () => {
|
|
const a = await seedCompany()
|
|
const supplierInvoiceId = await seedSupplierInvoice({ userId: a.userId, companyId: a.companyId })
|
|
|
|
const res = await getPool().query(INSERT_SUPPLIER_PAYMENT, [a.userId, a.companyId, supplierInvoiceId])
|
|
expect(res.rows).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
expect(res.rows[0].id).toBeTruthy()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects a payment whose company_id is a different tenant than its supplier invoice', async () => {
|
|
const a = await seedCompany()
|
|
const b = await seedCompany()
|
|
const supplierInvoiceId = await seedSupplierInvoice({ userId: a.userId, companyId: a.companyId })
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
getPool().query(INSERT_SUPPLIER_PAYMENT, [b.userId, b.companyId, supplierInvoiceId]),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/does not match supplier_invoices\.company_id/i)
|
|
|
|
const rows = await getPool().query(
|
|
`SELECT id FROM public.supplier_invoice_payments WHERE supplier_invoice_id = $1`,
|
|
[supplierInvoiceId],
|
|
)
|
|
expect(rows.rows).toHaveLength(0)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects an UPDATE that points company_id at a foreign tenant', async () => {
|
|
const a = await seedCompany()
|
|
const b = await seedCompany()
|
|
const supplierInvoiceId = await seedSupplierInvoice({ userId: a.userId, companyId: a.companyId })
|
|
const ins = await getPool().query(INSERT_SUPPLIER_PAYMENT, [a.userId, a.companyId, supplierInvoiceId])
|
|
const paymentId = ins.rows[0].id as string
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
getPool().query(`UPDATE public.supplier_invoice_payments SET company_id = $1 WHERE id = $2`, [
|
|
b.companyId,
|
|
paymentId,
|
|
]),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/does not match supplier_invoices\.company_id/i)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects rerouting supplier_invoice_id to a foreign tenant invoice (UPDATE OF supplier_invoice_id path)', async () => {
|
|
const a = await seedCompany()
|
|
const b = await seedCompany()
|
|
const siA = await seedSupplierInvoice({ userId: a.userId, companyId: a.companyId })
|
|
const siB = await seedSupplierInvoice({ userId: b.userId, companyId: b.companyId })
|
|
const ins = await getPool().query(INSERT_SUPPLIER_PAYMENT, [a.userId, a.companyId, siA])
|
|
const paymentId = ins.rows[0].id as string
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
getPool().query(
|
|
`UPDATE public.supplier_invoice_payments SET supplier_invoice_id = $1 WHERE id = $2`,
|
|
[siB, paymentId],
|
|
),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/does not match supplier_invoices\.company_id/i)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|