* fix: prevent silent data truncation in report generators Supabase PostgREST silently truncates queries at 1000 rows. Several report generators used bare .select() without fetchAllRows(), causing incomplete financial data — a BFL compliance violation. Wrapped 10 queries across 7 files with fetchAllRows(): - monthly-breakdown: journal_entry_lines (easily >1000/period) - ar-ledger: unpaid invoices - supplier-ledger: unpaid supplier invoices - salary-journal: salary_run_employees (+ optimized with !inner join) - vacation-liability: employees + salary_run_employees - full-archive-export: document_attachments + journal_entry IDs - ingest.ts: supplier invoices for auto-matching Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: address Greptile review — try/catch and client-side safety checks - Wrap full-archive-export document fetch in try/catch to match the VAT section pattern — a failed document query should not prevent the rest of the archive from being generated. - Restore client-side year/status safety checks in salary-journal and vacation-liability as defense-in-depth against PostgREST !inner filter regressions, per BFL lönejournal and BFNAR 2016:10 compliance. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
110 lines
3.1 KiB
TypeScript
110 lines
3.1 KiB
TypeScript
import type { SupabaseClient } from '@supabase/supabase-js'
|
|
import { fetchAllRows } from '@/lib/supabase/fetch-all'
|
|
|
|
export interface SupplierLedgerEntry {
|
|
supplier_id: string
|
|
supplier_name: string
|
|
current: number
|
|
days_1_30: number
|
|
days_31_60: number
|
|
days_61_90: number
|
|
days_90_plus: number
|
|
total_outstanding: number
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export interface SupplierLedgerReport {
|
|
entries: SupplierLedgerEntry[]
|
|
total_outstanding: number
|
|
total_current: number
|
|
total_overdue: number
|
|
unpaid_count: number
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Generate supplier ledger (leverantörsreskontra) with aging analysis
|
|
*/
|
|
export async function generateSupplierLedger(
|
|
supabase: SupabaseClient,
|
|
companyId: string,
|
|
asOfDate?: string
|
|
): Promise<SupplierLedgerReport> {
|
|
const refDate = asOfDate ? new Date(asOfDate) : new Date()
|
|
|
|
// Fetch all unpaid/partially_paid supplier invoices
|
|
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
|
let invoices: any[]
|
|
try {
|
|
invoices = await fetchAllRows(({ from, to }) =>
|
|
supabase
|
|
.from('supplier_invoices')
|
|
.select('*, supplier:suppliers(id, name)')
|
|
.eq('company_id', companyId)
|
|
.in('status', ['registered', 'approved', 'partially_paid', 'overdue'])
|
|
.range(from, to)
|
|
)
|
|
} catch {
|
|
return {
|
|
entries: [],
|
|
total_outstanding: 0,
|
|
total_current: 0,
|
|
total_overdue: 0,
|
|
unpaid_count: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Group by supplier and calculate aging
|
|
const bySupplier = new Map<string, SupplierLedgerEntry>()
|
|
|
|
for (const inv of invoices) {
|
|
const supplierId = inv.supplier_id
|
|
const supplierName = inv.supplier?.name || 'Okänd leverantör'
|
|
|
|
if (!bySupplier.has(supplierId)) {
|
|
bySupplier.set(supplierId, {
|
|
supplier_id: supplierId,
|
|
supplier_name: supplierName,
|
|
current: 0,
|
|
days_1_30: 0,
|
|
days_31_60: 0,
|
|
days_61_90: 0,
|
|
days_90_plus: 0,
|
|
total_outstanding: 0,
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const entry = bySupplier.get(supplierId)!
|
|
const dueDate = new Date(inv.due_date)
|
|
const daysOverdue = Math.floor((refDate.getTime() - dueDate.getTime()) / (1000 * 60 * 60 * 24))
|
|
const amount = inv.remaining_amount || 0
|
|
|
|
if (daysOverdue <= 0) {
|
|
entry.current += amount
|
|
} else if (daysOverdue <= 30) {
|
|
entry.days_1_30 += amount
|
|
} else if (daysOverdue <= 60) {
|
|
entry.days_31_60 += amount
|
|
} else if (daysOverdue <= 90) {
|
|
entry.days_61_90 += amount
|
|
} else {
|
|
entry.days_90_plus += amount
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
entry.total_outstanding += amount
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const entries = Array.from(bySupplier.values())
|
|
.sort((a, b) => b.total_outstanding - a.total_outstanding)
|
|
|
|
const total_outstanding = entries.reduce((sum, e) => sum + e.total_outstanding, 0)
|
|
const total_current = entries.reduce((sum, e) => sum + e.current, 0)
|
|
const total_overdue = total_outstanding - total_current
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
entries,
|
|
total_outstanding: Math.round(total_outstanding * 100) / 100,
|
|
total_current: Math.round(total_current * 100) / 100,
|
|
total_overdue: Math.round(total_overdue * 100) / 100,
|
|
unpaid_count: invoices.length,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|