* fix(transactions): abort supplier-invoice match when payment voucher fails The match route caught a payment-JE creation failure and proceeded anyway: invoice marked paid with payment_journal_entry_id NULL, a payments row with no voucher, and the bank line linked but unbooked. That half-state is unrecoverable from the UI — mark-paid rejects 'paid' invoices and the match route rejects already-linked transactions (the "user can re-book" comment was wrong). The v1 route was already strict; this aligns the cookie route. A failed voucher now fails the whole match before any state mutation, with bookkeeping errors mapped to their structured codes and a new MATCH_SI_JE_FAILED fallback. Incident: Arcim 2026-06-11 — invoice 20250928 marked paid with no payment voucher because account 3740 was missing from the chart. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(transactions): bank-sync supplier-invoice match is a suggestion, not a hard link A high-confidence (>=0.85, unambiguous) supplier-invoice hit at sync time set transactions.supplier_invoice_id directly — without booking a payment or touching the invoice. The half-link then BLOCKED the match route (MATCH_SI_TX_ALREADY_LINKED), stranding the bank line with no path to a payment voucher and the invoice stuck on 'registered'. Sync now always writes potential_supplier_invoice_id; the hard link is reserved for completed matches where the payment voucher is booked. High-confidence hits still drain the matching pool and skip the mapping engine. Incident: Arcim 2026-06-11 — RosholmDell 18299 (29 890 kr) auto-linked at sync, unmatchable afterwards. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(bookkeeping): seed standard BAS accounts on demand in the engine A minimal company chart routinely lacks accounts that legitimate engine flows reach — 3740 (öres- och kronutjämning) the first time a Bankgiro payment lands a sub-krona off the invoice, 6580 on a first legal invoice. createDraftEntry threw AccountsNotInChartError and turned a standard account into a dead end. The engine now backfills missing accounts from BAS_REFERENCE (full metadata incl. SRU code) before failing. Conservative by design: unknown numbers still throw, and deactivated accounts are never resurrected — deactivation is a deliberate user choice. Concurrent seeding (23505) counts as success. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(supplier-invoices): require explicit expense account, drop the 5010 seed Every new line item (and every AI-prefilled line) was silently seeded with account 5010 Lokalhyra. AI extraction deliberately never suggests accounts, so any invoice saved without touching the field was misbooked as premises rent — legally wrong verifikat that need rättelse to fix. Lines now start with an empty account: the supplier's default_expense_account fills empty rows when set, and submit blocks with a clear toast until every row has an account. Incident: Arcim 2026-06-11 — a legal-services invoice (should be 6580) and a SaaS subscription (should be 5420) both posted to 5010. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * refactor(bookkeeping): clarify voucher description suffix to (ankomstnr N) "(ankomst 2)" read as "arrived twice" / a duplicate marker; it is the company-internal sequential arrival counter for supplier invoices. "(ankomstnr 2)" says what the number is. Existing posted vouchers keep their old description (immutable). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(transactions): cancel orphaned payment voucher when match loses the CAS race When the payment JE posts but the invoice CAS update matches 0 rows (a concurrent request settled it first), both match routes returned MATCH_SI_NOT_OPEN and left the voucher orphaned in the ledger. mark-paid has always compensated for exactly this case; the compensation is now a shared helper (cancelOrphanedPaymentEntry: cancel + voucher-gap explanation per BFNAR 2013:2) used by all three routes. Flagged by the compliance swarm and the Swedish compliance review on PR #711 — the one finding both converged on. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(bookkeeping): next_voucher_number user_id fallback for service-role contexts Mirrors 20260421170500 (commit_journal_entry got this fix; its twin did not). Under a service-role client auth.uid() is NULL and the voucher_sequences upsert fails its user_id NOT NULL check before ON CONFLICT can arbitrate — even when the sequence row exists. Every non-interactive caller of the storno/correction path (getNextVoucherNumber → correctEntry) was broken. Fallback: companies.created_by (same source seed_chart_of_accounts uses). Interactive flows still record auth.uid(); DO UPDATE never touches user_id on existing rows. Also restores SET search_path = public, lost when 20260330 recreated the function after the 20260304 hardening. pg-real: new test exercises the RPC on the superuser connection (auth.uid() IS NULL) and asserts sequential numbers + owner attribution. Found live: the Arcim repair script booked payment vouchers fine (commit_journal_entry) but failed on corrections (next_voucher_number). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(bookkeeping): harden cancelOrphanedPaymentEntry — never throw, breadcrumb before mutating Two hardenings from the PR #711 review round: - Whole body wrapped in try/catch: the caller is returning the correct CAS-conflict response, so an unexpected client rejection must not replace it with a 500 (best-effort is now a hard guarantee). - The gap-recovery data (series, number, period, explanation) is logged BEFORE the cancel: the cancel and gap insert are separate statements, and a crash between them would otherwise leave a cancelled voucher with no BFNAR 2013:2 gap explanation and no way to reconstruct it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
133 lines
4.2 KiB
TypeScript
133 lines
4.2 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect, vi } from 'vitest'
|
|
import { backfillStandardBASAccounts } from '../account-backfill'
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Flexible supabase mock: every chain method returns the chain; awaiting it
|
|
* resolves the queued result for that table+operation. Inserts are captured.
|
|
*/
|
|
function createMockSupabase(opts: {
|
|
existingRows?: { account_number: string }[]
|
|
insertError?: { code?: string; message: string } | null
|
|
}) {
|
|
const inserts: unknown[] = []
|
|
const makeChain = (result: { data?: unknown; error?: unknown }) => {
|
|
const chain: Record<string, unknown> = {}
|
|
const handler: ProxyHandler<object> = {
|
|
get(_t, prop) {
|
|
if (prop === 'then') {
|
|
return (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) =>
|
|
resolve({ data: result.data ?? null, error: result.error ?? null })
|
|
}
|
|
return (..._args: unknown[]) => new Proxy(chain, handler)
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
return new Proxy(chain, handler)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const supabase = {
|
|
from: vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => {
|
|
const base: Record<string, unknown> = {
|
|
select: () => makeChain({ data: opts.existingRows ?? [] }),
|
|
insert: (rows: unknown) => {
|
|
inserts.push(rows)
|
|
return makeChain({ error: opts.insertError ?? null })
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
return base
|
|
}),
|
|
}
|
|
return { supabase, inserts }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe('backfillStandardBASAccounts', () => {
|
|
it('seeds a standard BAS account with full reference metadata', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, inserts } = createMockSupabase({ existingRows: [] })
|
|
|
|
const result = await backfillStandardBASAccounts(
|
|
supabase as never, 'company-1', 'user-1', ['3740'],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toEqual(['3740'])
|
|
expect(inserts).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
const rows = inserts[0] as Record<string, unknown>[]
|
|
expect(rows).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
expect(rows[0]).toMatchObject({
|
|
company_id: 'company-1',
|
|
user_id: 'user-1',
|
|
account_number: '3740',
|
|
account_name: 'Öres- och kronutjämning',
|
|
account_class: 3,
|
|
account_group: '37',
|
|
is_active: true,
|
|
is_system_account: false,
|
|
plan_type: 'full_bas',
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('skips numbers that are not standard BAS accounts', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, inserts } = createMockSupabase({ existingRows: [] })
|
|
|
|
const result = await backfillStandardBASAccounts(
|
|
supabase as never, 'company-1', 'user-1', ['9999'],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toEqual([])
|
|
expect(inserts).toHaveLength(0)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('never resurrects an existing (deactivated) account', async () => {
|
|
// The caller saw 3740 as missing because it is INACTIVE — deactivation is
|
|
// a deliberate user choice, so the backfill must not touch the row.
|
|
const { supabase, inserts } = createMockSupabase({
|
|
existingRows: [{ account_number: '3740' }],
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const result = await backfillStandardBASAccounts(
|
|
supabase as never, 'company-1', 'user-1', ['3740'],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toEqual([])
|
|
expect(inserts).toHaveLength(0)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('treats a concurrent duplicate insert (23505) as success', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase } = createMockSupabase({
|
|
existingRows: [],
|
|
insertError: { code: '23505', message: 'duplicate key value' },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const result = await backfillStandardBASAccounts(
|
|
supabase as never, 'company-1', 'user-1', ['3740'],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toEqual(['3740'])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns [] on a non-duplicate insert error', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase } = createMockSupabase({
|
|
existingRows: [],
|
|
insertError: { code: '42501', message: 'permission denied' },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const result = await backfillStandardBASAccounts(
|
|
supabase as never, 'company-1', 'user-1', ['3740'],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toEqual([])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('seeds only the missing standard accounts from a mixed list', async () => {
|
|
const { supabase, inserts } = createMockSupabase({
|
|
existingRows: [{ account_number: '6580' }],
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const result = await backfillStandardBASAccounts(
|
|
supabase as never, 'company-1', 'user-1', ['3740', '6580', 'XYZ1'],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toEqual(['3740'])
|
|
const rows = inserts[0] as Record<string, unknown>[]
|
|
expect(rows.map((r) => r.account_number)).toEqual(['3740'])
|
|
})
|
|
})
|