Jakob Wennberg
521f437072
Visma and Fortnox migrations now carry each invoice's source voucher reference, and after the invoice steps a core linker resolves it against the SIE-imported ledger (voucher-ref resolver by date, corroborated by the 244x credit / 151x debit amount, posted only, unreferenced only) and writes registration_journal_entry_id / journal_entry_id. Anything ambiguous, mismatched or unresolved is reported and left NULL; journal entries are never written. The arcim-migration /reconcile endpoint can relink already-migrated companies. Payment vouchers are PR B. Refs #1463
75 lines
2.6 KiB
TypeScript
75 lines
2.6 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest'
|
|
import { mapVismaToSalesInvoice, mapVismaToSupplierInvoice } from '../mapper'
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* eAccounting names the booking voucher on both invoice APIs as
|
|
* `VoucherNumber` ("A329"). The migration links the imported invoice to the
|
|
* SIE-imported verifikat through it (#1463), so the mapper must carry it as
|
|
* a parsed ref, and must carry NOTHING when the field is absent or unreadable.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
function salesRaw(over: Record<string, unknown> = {}): Record<string, unknown> {
|
|
return {
|
|
Id: 's1',
|
|
InvoiceNumber: '10060',
|
|
InvoiceDate: '2026-07-24',
|
|
DueDate: '2026-08-10',
|
|
CurrencyCode: 'SEK',
|
|
TotalAmount: 75000,
|
|
TotalVatAmount: 15000,
|
|
InvoiceCustomerName: 'Kund AB',
|
|
Rows: [],
|
|
...over,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function supplierRaw(over: Record<string, unknown> = {}): Record<string, unknown> {
|
|
return {
|
|
Id: 'b1',
|
|
InvoiceNumber: '903127919426',
|
|
InvoiceDate: '2026-07-31',
|
|
DueDate: '2026-08-30',
|
|
CurrencyCode: 'SEK',
|
|
TotalAmount: 1250,
|
|
TotalVatAmount: 250,
|
|
SupplierName: 'PostNord Sverige AB',
|
|
Rows: [],
|
|
...over,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe('mapVismaToSalesInvoice: sourceVoucher', () => {
|
|
it('parses VoucherNumber into series + number', () => {
|
|
const dto = mapVismaToSalesInvoice(salesRaw({ VoucherNumber: 'A329' }))
|
|
expect(dto.sourceVoucher).toEqual({ series: 'A', number: 329 })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('keeps a bare number as series-less', () => {
|
|
const dto = mapVismaToSalesInvoice(salesRaw({ VoucherNumber: '329' }))
|
|
expect(dto.sourceVoucher).toEqual({ series: null, number: 329 })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('leaves sourceVoucher undefined when the field is absent', () => {
|
|
const dto = mapVismaToSalesInvoice(salesRaw())
|
|
expect(dto.sourceVoucher).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('leaves sourceVoucher undefined when the field is malformed', () => {
|
|
expect(mapVismaToSalesInvoice(salesRaw({ VoucherNumber: '' })).sourceVoucher).toBeUndefined()
|
|
expect(mapVismaToSalesInvoice(salesRaw({ VoucherNumber: 'n/a' })).sourceVoucher).toBeUndefined()
|
|
expect(mapVismaToSalesInvoice(salesRaw({ VoucherNumber: null })).sourceVoucher).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('mapVismaToSupplierInvoice: sourceVoucher', () => {
|
|
it('parses VoucherNumber into series + number', () => {
|
|
const dto = mapVismaToSupplierInvoice(supplierRaw({ VoucherNumber: 'B 41' }))
|
|
expect(dto.sourceVoucher).toEqual({ series: 'B', number: 41 })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('leaves sourceVoucher undefined when absent or malformed', () => {
|
|
expect(mapVismaToSupplierInvoice(supplierRaw()).sourceVoucher).toBeUndefined()
|
|
expect(mapVismaToSupplierInvoice(supplierRaw({ VoucherNumber: 'A' })).sourceVoucher).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
})
|